Pages

October 31, 2016

Project Fi subscribers are getting a new tool to track data usage today. A post in the Fi sub-Reddit by the verified Google community manager account says data tracking will now update live, and that usage will be broken out by app. It's all live right now—just open the app and check it out.

2016-10-31_22-18-33_1024 2016-10-31_22-26-48_1024

Data updating left to right. 

This feature requires Android 7.0 or higher, but that shouldn't be a problem considering Fi is mostly limited to devices that Google updates. You need to be on Fi app version K.2.7.20 or later, but that's over a month old. You can see that version, and more recent ones on APK Mirror. This indicates the new data tracking features are probably a server-side switch.

The live updating usage will be available in the app's main screen as well as on the data usage widget. This change means that you'll be notified immediately if you exceed your data cap. The per-app usage breakdown is under "View details" for the current billing cycle.

  • Source:
  • Reddit

Blue Coral Galaxy S7 Edge is coming to US carriers later this year

When the Galaxy Note7 was discontinued, Samsung lost a big chunk of change and consumers lost the opportunity to buy that really lovely Blue Coral version of the phone. Blue Coral isn't dead, though. After announcing a Blue Coral version of the Galaxy S7 Edge in Asia, Samsung now confirms it's coming to the US too.

The Blue Coral Galaxy S7 Edge will be sold by all major carriers, but Samsung doesn't have an exact date. It only says the the device will be out by the end of the year. Other than the blue glass panels and gold edges, it's the same phone you can get right now. It has a Snapdragon 820, 4GB of RAM, and a 5.5-inch 1440p curved AMOLED.

Samsung didn't note pricing for the phone, but the Asian version was priced in-line with existing models. It's not one of those special edition phones that cost extra. I'd expect this to just be another color option for US carriers, so the price should be the same.

T-Mobile's $325 off Pixel promo is now available to customers with Simple Choice Unlimited plans too

John Legere is well-known for being a rather unconventional CEO, and the Pixel promo that T-Mobile took the wraps off of last week had Legere stamped all over it (it was essentially the equivalent of spitting in Verizon's face). The $325 bill credit for having a Pixel on T-Mobile seemed like a sweet deal at first glance, but it required customers to be on the carrier's controversial, "unlimited" ONE plan.

We first heard about T-Mobile extending the offer to non-ONE customers when a reader tipped us with a thread from the Pixel subreddit (thanks, Alex!), but nothing was official. However, T-Mobile has just updated its promo's press release to indicate that Simple Choice unlimited customers are now eligible for this offer as well. Rejoice!

For those of you who aren't mobile data plan fanatics, Simple Choice Unlimited was a plan that included unlimited LTE data. Sure, it supposedly de-prioritized speeds when traffic was heavy for customers who used more than 26GB per month, but that almost never actually impacted anyone. This plan was praised by many, but it was axed when ONE arrived. Not unsurprisingly, existing Simple Choice Unlimited subscribers hung onto their discontinued plans.

Those customers will no doubt be pleased to know that they, too, can now receive $325 back in the form of bill credits. To be granted these bill credits ($13.55 per month for 24 months), you'll have to hand over your Pixel's IMEI and prove that you purchased your Pixel less than 30 days ago.

  • Source:
  • T-Mobile

[Boo!] Google shares the spookiest Street View locations from around the world

Do you want to go trick-or-treating but don't feel like getting off your couch? Don't worry, Google's got you covered. With Google Maps and Google Street View, you can visit some of the spookiest places on Earth from the comfort (and safety) of your home.

Roaming around in a virtual world is the perfect excuse to use a VR headset like Google Cardboard or Daydream View — which is too bad since we still don't know when it'll begin shipping.

Some of Google's picks include the Dungeons of Amsterdam, the Winchester Mystery House in California, and the Haw Par Villa theme park in Singapore. To finish off your tour, Google recommends stopping by the Disidentes cemetery in Chile to contemplate your final resting place.

halloween_image_4-width-1000

To learn more about these and other locations, head on over to Google's blog in the sourcel ink below.

  • Source:
  • The Keyword

Xiaomi seriously considering a US phone launch in the next year or two, hints Hugo Barra

The Chinese smartphone upstart known as Xiaomi has had its sights set on the United States for quite a while, but only now is that really coming to a head. In a recent interview with Engadget, Xiaomi's Global VP, and former Googler, Hugo Barra revealed that Xiaomi phones are being actively tested in the US in preparation for a launch sometime in the next two years.

For a US launch, if the respective phone manufacturer wants to partner with the carriers, a lot of very rigorous device testing is required beforehand, in the lab and in field tests, both of which are notoriously tough. Barra says in the interview, "Earlier this year we had a special version of Mi 5 that we made just for testing in the US, just so that we can start testing and doing small-field trials to sharpen our chops, if you will." Because Band 17, used by AT&T for LTE, is a rarely used band, it requires the carrier and manufacturer to co-operate in order for things to be as close to perfect upon launch. Most major manufacturers now know the procedure and requirements for testing a phone on a carrier network, but as Xiaomi is a newcomer to the lucrative US market, it must start from scratch and learn how things work.

Barra also said "we're not going to launch something until we're ready," so that makes it pretty clear that while a United States launch for Xiaomi is surely coming, that won't be for at least another year, and most likely two or more. You can read more at the source; it is a very concise, well thought-out, readable interview. However, this doesn't change the fact that it'll probably be a while before we get a fully functional Xiaomi phone sold in the US for Americans.

  • Source:
  • Engadget

How to Stay on the Strongest Wi-Fi Network at All Times

It’s not easy living without WiFi, especially when you’re traveling, so when your phone is in range of a steady wireless connection, you probably want to stick with it. Unfortunately, our phones aren’t always the best at identifying the strongest WiFi signal, but there are ways to fix this.

Advertisement

On Android, you’ll stay on your current network until the signal dies completely, and even after your signal dies, you won’t necessarily get switched to the next best WiFi broadcast. If you want to take more control over which networks are connected to when, install Wifi Switcher.

The app lets you set up “preferred” routers that take priority at all times as well as configure a custom distance threshold that needs to be reached before your device swaps to a new network (handy if you’re in a house or office with lots of access points). You can also turn off mobile data when switching and jump from 5GHz and 2.4GHz bands on the same router.

The app is simple enough to use and find your way around in (even if you’re not a wireless networking engineer). Tick the Preferred box next to any WiFi network you want your device to stick with or find first and open up the settings panel via the menu button in the corner to set more options for the app.

Advertisement

There are plenty of alternatives around on Android if you’re prepared to do some experimenting. The best one for you might depend on the setup at your home, office, or coffee shop, and the exact features you need. If Wifi Switcher doesn’t do it for you, try Swifi Auto Switch or Best Wifi.

Over in the land of iPhones and iPads, iOS uses a variety of criteria to decide which networks to attach itself to automatically, including the network security settings and hotspot type. There’s no easy way to set up ‘preferred’ networks using the default options you get with iOS.

There are a number of workarounds you can try, though none automatically detect signal strength. The first is to install WiFi Priority, which isn’t quite as slick or as user-friendly as the __apps on Android but does exactly what it promises it will. It lets you disable auto-join on certain networks, which in turn prioritizes the alternatives whenever iOS is trying to connect. You can still connect to any network with a tap.

Another slightly long-winded way of achieving the same end result is to install Apple Configurator 2 on your Mac and create a customized iPhone profile from there (How-To Geek has a comprehensive guide to the process you can check out). As with WiFi Priority, you can disable the auto-join on certain networks, thus prioritizing others.

Advertisement

Sponsored

Finally there’s a tip shared on a blog by Nick Heer that says any WiFi preferences you set up on macOS will automatically sync across iCloud to iOS devices using the same Apple ID. You can prioritize certain networks through System Preferences on your Mac (as we’ve previously covered on Field Guide) and that should do the trick, though you might have to reset Network Settings first, and not everyone has been able to get this to work.

October 30, 2016

Weekend poll: Where and how did you buy your Google Pixel?

Last weekend, I asked you if you bought a Google Pixel (or ordered one) - about 5,000 of you responded that you had. Interestingly, the most popular model among Android Police readers looks to be the 128GB XL, which is the most expensive Pixel you can buy. Google's financing and availability through Verizon no doubt are the reason for this: by spreading payments over a term of months, you greatly reduce the immediate financial impact of what would otherwise be a nearly thousand-dollar purchase. Outside the US, though, the availability of such things is more limited.

This week, I want to know where and how you bought your Google Pixel. I know the vast majority of AP readers likely did so through the Google Store, but I am interested to know just how much Verizon subscribers have been taking advantage of the latest Google product being available directly through their provider.

So, let's get to it! (There is no option if you did not buy a Pixel - this poll is for only those who did. Don't worry - we'll be back with a non-Pixel-only poll next weekend. Also, for our international readers, I realize the Pixel is being sold by some operators and retailers, but we simply can't list them all.)

Where and how did you buy your Google Pixel?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

[Deal Alert] Get a Sony Xperia XZ for just $649.99 from Amazon ($50 off)

As of late, Sony Mobile has been making some pretty decent smartphones, but it destroys any chances of them succeeding by slapping massive price tags on them. The relatively new Xperia XZ is one of these phones; it's nice, but $700 nice? Not to most. However, with this latest markdown by Amazon, you can grab an XZ with a US warranty for $649.99, $50 less than the MSRP.

Unfortunately, the fact that this XZ carries a US warranty means that its side-mounted fingerprint sensor has been disabled (it can be re-enabled with a firmware flash). That being said, the rest of the phone's specs are still solid; they include a 5.2" 1080p display with Gorilla Glass 4, a Snapdragon 820, 3GB of RAM, 32GB of internal storage, a 23MP camera, and 2900mAh battery. In addition, despite its unassuming appearance, it's IP68 water and dust-resistant.

Amazon has discounted all three colors (black, blue, and silver) to $649.99. Since the phone is being shipped and sold by Amazon, you'll get fast shipping if you're a Prime member. You also won't have to deal with third-party sellers, who can be a pain to deal with sometimes. We're not sure how long this offer will last, so if you've been on the lookout for an Xperia XZ, you may want to jump on this soon.

  • Source:
  • Amazon

October 29, 2016

Allo 2.0 has hidden chat themes, for your theming needs

The first major update to Allo, version 2.0, added a number of much-needed improvements. However, WhatsApp users may note that chat themes are still missing in Allo. 9to5Google has managed to enable some hidden themes included with the update, which can be enabled on a per-user basis.

screenshot_20161029-014537 screenshot_20161029-014516 screenshot_20161029-014528

These are just a few of the numerous themes already inside the Allo APK, presumably waiting for Google to flip the server-side switch. 9to5Google did not share the method used to unlock the themes, only saying it was done on a rooted phone. If you want to gander at all the hidden themes, go visit the source link below.

Allo (Playboard) | Allo (Play Store)
  • Source:
  • 9to5Google

Google celebrates Halloween with ghosts, ghouls, witches, pumpkins, and more in Android Pay

To most people, Halloween means witches, ghosts, and ghouls. Google's obviously gone with this definition too, since the animations on Android Pay have been updated to include a range of the undead, pumpkins, witches, wizards, ghosts, ghouls, and skeletons.

There seem to be a lot of these so we've been unable to find them all and present them here, but we've found a few, which you can see in the screenshots, GIFs, and YouTube video. The animation appears when you have paid for something using Android Pay, and seems to work in all countries Android Pay is active (the US, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australia at the moment).

 

android-pay-halloween

If you're in either of those countries, you can download Android Pay on Google Play, or at APK Mirror.

Android Pay (Playboard) | Android Pay (Play Store)
  • Thanks:
  • Drew,
  • Jacob,
  • Max,
  • Chris (Twitter),
  • and anyone else who sent this in!

'Chrome Home' flag hidden in Chrome Dev/Canary, moves address bar to bottom

In a world of large phones, it makes sense to move commonly-used actions to the bottom of the screen. A new flag in Chrome Dev and Canary, only described as 'Chrome Home,' moves Chrome's address bar to the bottom of the screen when enabled.

screenshot_20161029-213236 screenshot_20161029-213325 screenshot_20161029-213301

This is clearly unfinished, as the space where the address bar occupied at the top is completely blank. This actually reminds me of Windows 10 Mobile's Edge browser, where the navigation bar is also at the bottom.

The name of the flag, Chrome Home, is a bit puzzling. The name doesn't really indicate anything about an address bar; perhaps this is just part of a greater feature. Either way, you can enable this in Chrome Dev and Canary by pasting chrome://flags/#enable-chrome-home into Chrome, tapping the highlighted select menu, tapping Enabled, and restarting the browser.

Chrome Beta (Playboard) | Chrome Beta (Play Store)
Chrome Canary (Playboard) | Chrome Canary (Play Store)
  • Thanks:
  • Eddie Ringle

Hands-on with MUVIZ Nav Bar Audio Visualizer: Really neat if you are into this sort of thing

Music is definitely everywhere. From our own personal libraries and streaming stations to advertisements and entertainment, it is a fundamental part of who we are as individuals and as a culture (for better or for worse). Since music is just noise (how's that for a scientific breakthrough), I have always found it neat to see the visual representation of the soundwaves in line with the song that is playing. Back when Windows Media Player was a thing, I always turned on the visualizer, finding it much more entertaining than staring at the album art — or worse, the placeholder image when no art was available.

So, that brings us to MUVIZ, an audio visualizer that sits right above your nav bar or hardware nav. Working across most music and video apps, it allows for a myriad of different colors, styles, and other fine-tuned settings. The best part for most of you? No root required.

First Startup and Settings

Before even getting into visualization, MUVIZ asks for the permission to record audio. This is simply to allow the app to listen to the media playback, analyze it, and output it to your screen. Nothing nefarious here. Once you get through that, you're asked to choose whether you want the visualizer above or below your nav bar (if you have softkeys). Below is what the devs recommend and that is what I prefer to use, too.

screenshot_20161028-160533 screenshot_20161028-160548

After this, you're thrown into a rather large list of visualization options. It starts off with different styles, like bars, peaks, lines, squares, and circles. Some of these are pretty cool and some are rather ridiculous, but most of them are locked behind the Pro upgrade. There is also the option to create your own style, if you have the desire to do so.

Delving further into these customization options, you get to fine tune the style you chose on the main screen. This is where it can get fun. You can continue to live test all of the choices, and below that you can adjust the shape and colors to your heart's content.

screenshot_20161027-215927 screenshot_20161028-161704 screenshot_20161027-113816 screenshot_20161028-162439

As you can see from the above screenshots, there is a lot to do here. On a final note about colors, there is a wide range of "stock" ones to choose from — I gravitated toward the blue spectrum, of course. However, the app will pull in your current wallpaper (you can see mine at the top of the style options screen) and offer you a nice selection of colors from that. Think Quicktheme from Action Launcher, if that helps.

Finally, there's a typical app settings menu. First on the list is the option to choose which __apps MUVIZ will play over. Take note, however, that the devs do mention this is a beta feature and may not behave the same on all phones. It also requires __apps usage access. Once beyond the warning and granting access screen, you get to a list of all installed apps. I am sure you know what to do from there.

screenshot_20161028-163207 screenshot_20161028-163322 screenshot_20161028-163330 screenshot_20161028-163338

Moving on, you can decide whether you want MUVIZ to be hidden over fullscreen apps (like YouTube, MX Player, etc.) and the lockscreen. The persistent notification allows for the visualization to start when your music begins, and disabling this can cause some jank when you start playing media.

The random "viz" is for apps not supported by MUVIZ, such as Instagram. I highly recommend turning this off, unless you want random bars at the bottom of your screen when scrolling through any of your feeds with auto-play videos. Here in the settings you can also change the position of the visualization that you chose at app startup. This is great for just another element of experimentation.

Using MUVIZ

When you start any music or video, MUVIZ will automatically start... visualizing. There is not much else to it. I really enjoy how it looks, especially since I chose a darker blue. When in Google Play Music, for instance, I think it looks really clean even with the black nav bar. Since I selected my color from the choices presented based on my wallpaper, it looks a little more muted on my homescreen — which, as it happens, I really like.

screenshot_20161028-165236 screenshot_20161028-165504

And that is pretty much it. You can always delve back into those settings I mentioned earlier and try out different things. It took me a few tries to really find a color and shape I liked, but I opted for simple and subtle in the end.

Other than disabling the persistent notification (ahem, user error), I have not run into any stability issues with the app on my OnePlus 3 on Marshmallow. It starts up fairly quickly once music begins and vanishes as soon as playback stops. MUVIZ is a free download in the Play Store and requires 5.0 Lollipop and above. The Pro upgrade is a small $1.99, and I think it is worth it. Go ahead and give it a try.

MUVIZ Nav Bar Audio Visualizer (Playboard) | MUVIZ Nav Bar Audio Visualizer (Play Store)
  • Thanks:
  • Eduardo Ribeiro

Chainfire releases a systemless root method for the Pixel and Pixel XL

The Google Pixel phones' development has had a big week; just a few days ago, the Verizon and EE variants had their bootloaders unlocked. Now, Chainfire, the famed developer of SuperSU and FlashFire, has debuted a systemless root method for the Pixels.

Due to the Pixels' odd partition structure (two system, two boot, two vendor, zero recovery, and zero cache partitions), Chainfire's root method required a bit of re-engineering. It's pretty impressive how quickly he was able to do this, but we'd expect no less from him.

Essentially, Chainfire is making the kernel use some files inside the boot image as the root directory, instead of files from the system partition. That's an incredible oversimplification and doesn't do the effort justice, but you can read the developer's own Google+ post for a ton more details.

However, the root method currently isn't perfect. There are some bugs, some issues with Nexus 5X and 6P devices running the Android 7.1.1 developer preview, compatibility problems with many root applications due to the change from full-disk to file-based encryption, and the question of how OTAs will work with the Pixels' root. In addition, CF-Auto-Root still needs some fine-tuning, and suhide (a method of circumventing Google's SafetyNet security check) isn't ready for prime time yet.

If you've got a Pixel and want to root it, the source links below contain the files and information you need.

  • Source:
  • Chainfire (Google+ post),
  • (Pixel download),
  • (Pixel XL download)

October 28, 2016

Google Pixel review update: Two weeks with the Google phone

Article Contents

  • 1 Look, feel, and form
  • 2 Battery life
  • 3 Signal reception and wireless generally
  • 4 Audio
  • 5 Camera
  • 6 Performance
  • 7 Bugs and stability
  • 8 Overall

It's been a little over two weeks since I received my Google Pixel (XL) review unit, so I thought I would provide an addendum to our review based on more time with the phone. I won't be covering every category I did in the review. But I will try to give you the broad strokes on areas where my thoughts haven't changed much, and some of the specifics where they have.

Look, feel, and form

I still think this phone looks a bit dull. Other members of the team disagree, though! And I think that really is the subjective nature of design coming into play here. Conversely, I love holding the Pixel, it's a joy to use. It's well-balanced, it's a nice size, and the bezels simply don't bother me (and the lower one gives my thumb a place to counter-balance the weight of the top). But this Quite black XL just doesn't visually do a lot for me. It's just sort of... there.

One ergonomic quirk I've noted with the Pixel is that without a camera hump, I'm never sure if my fingers are smearing up the camera lens when I'm holding it, so I'm constantly wiping it down just in case. Yeah, it's a bit "OCD," but it's definitely something I find myself doing frequently. I still like the volume and power keys, and I still think they're among the very best I've used on any Android phone. The fingerprint scanner is definitely a bit slower than those on Motorola or LG's recent devices, and I do wish it was quicker.

DSC05437

While not as svelte as the Galaxy S7 edge, the Pixel XL is still what I would call very manageable, and I couldn't see myself downsizing to the smaller 5" display. I just like the bigger screen (after all, I've dealt with a Nexus 6 for two years). The display itself is very good - I don't find myself thinking about it much, which I suppose is high praise. I'm not fighting glare to a ridiculous degree in sunlight, and the adaptive brightness generally does an OK job in all but the darkest lighting, when I do find I have to use the slider in quick settings (I otherwise leave it at max).

As for the phone's low-friction factor, yeah: this sucker is slippery sometimes. The glass window helps you keep a grip on it, though, so I'm thankful for that, and while I did order a live case, I doubt I'll actually use it.

Battery life

It's still really good. The Pixel XL has been providing consistently excellent battery life to me every day I've used it. Google really does seem to have nailed down the battery life question with Android 7.1 on these phones, and it's such a relief. I regularly find myself cracking 4.5-5 hours of screen time in a 24-hour period, which is right up there with the Galaxy S7 edge. Idle battery life is excellent - I've had no runaway __apps sucking down power while my phone wasn't being used.

That said, I have had a few instances where the doze seems to have delayed receipt of notifications. If my phone sits on my desk for a half hour, the moment I turn on the display I get a pile of emails coming in. It's not as bad as it was when testing 7.0 on my Nexus 6, though, and like I said, this issue is very intermittent, and is probably just doze doing what it's supposed to do: using less power when you're not using your phone.

Either way, the Pixel XL has absolutely exceeded my expectations on battery life. Two unironic thumbs up.

Signal reception and wireless generally

My apartment has truly abysmal AT&T reception, and in the first week with the Pixel XL, I wasn't missing any calls - something I couldn't say of many other phones I test. Well, I've started missing some. The Pixel generally gets better LTE reception in my apartment than other phones, but the HSPA that's needed for voice calls on AT&T sometimes cuts out, sending people straight to my voicemail. The problem's still there on the Pixel. Equally, switching between LTE and HSPA sometimes causes the Pixel to freak out a bit, acting like it has no data connectivity, and even flipping in and out of airplane mode doesn't always fix it, so a reboot is needed.

These are fringe issues, though - I am testing the outer bounds of crappy signal conditions, and for the most part, the Pixel performs better than most other phones I test. Would I like Wi-Fi calling and VoLTE on AT&T to rid myself of these problems entirely? Yes please.

As to Bluetooth, I continue to have no issues - but many are having problems getting the Pixels to connect to their vehicles. It seems this may be a larger problem with Android 7.1, however, so I wouldn't pin it on the phones just yet. As to the less than great Bluetooth range I referred to in my review, it's not as bad as I initially thought. It's still not standout in performance, but it's also no worse than a lot of phones I test. It's just not the best.

DSC05446

Wi-Fi is an area where I'm still having some issues, though I do find the Pixel is actually much better at knowing when to dump a crappy Wi-Fi signal for a mobile network than any phone I've ever used. For example, when I'm in the gym in my apartment complex, most phones will try to stay connected to my home Wi-Fi network, but there's just no reliable signal to hang onto for actual connectivity. The Pixel falls back to mobile data instinctively, showing the unstable connection 'x' on the Wi-Fi status icon. But the issues I have more center around 2.4 and 5GHz switching behavior - often, the phone will switch between the networks, but then the connection will get either really slow or just not work at all. Flipping Wi-Fi off and back on resolves this. As I said, my apartment has pretty thick walls and the Wi-Fi penetration is just not good. Even my Shield, a whole room over from my router, just doesn't get great signal. But I do find other phones have handled these adverse conditions a bit better.

Audio

I maintain my position that, while not the loudest, the Pixel's bottom-firing speaker does sound quite good all things considered. It's more balanced and full than most other smartphones out there, even if its output isn't exactly tremendous. Also, its placement sucks, but it could be worse - remember when speakers were on the back of phones? What a nightmare that was.

DSC05448

Anyway, the headphone jack, I find, puts out totally ample volume even when using relatively beefy headphones. Some people will find it inadequate - that's just the way it goes. If headphone amplifier output is a huge buying concern for you, the Pixels don't go above and beyond anyone else in the industry. Sound quality itself is excellent, in my opinion. But if you want substantially more power from the amp, you'll have to get a V20 or an iPhone - you don't exactly have a lot of other choices. The Pixel does fine here, it's just not industry-leading. It's industry-acceptable.

Camera

I realize I offered some significant superlatives in regard to the camera in my review, so have my feelings cooled a bit over the past week-and-a-half? A bit. I will admit: the Pixel's camera does struggle with white balance at times (giving photos a 'cool' look), and low-light images can be incredibly noisy (but that's true of most phones). As for the infamous 'halo' effect? I haven't seen it on mine.

But overall, I maintain my position: this is the best smartphone camera I've ever used. The speed of captures just can't be matched, and it gives the Pixel an incredible edge when you're trying to capture a moment. Smartburst is legitimately useful, and the HDR+ processing can really do wonders.

The lens aperture isn't the widest, the noise isn't the lowest, and the auto-focus isn't the fastest. But for its occasional technical shortcomings, the Pixel's camera always seems to have a retort: look at this.

IMG_20161018_181905

I stand by the assertion that the electronic video stabilization is kind of creepy in its bizarre levels of smoothness, though.

Performance

Has the phone slowed down at all? Maybe slightly, though not at the system level, I find. It's the usual __apps that always seem to slow down a bit as they build up cache: Play Music, Twitter, and Google Maps. But once everything's loaded up, they're still faster than usual, and the phone itself is incredibly responsive. I believe this is the most iOS-y Android has ever felt in regard to performance. Task switching is exceptionally quick, and the system UI is always extremely responsive. Google's Pixel team clearly did a lot of optimizing to ensure that Android remained smooth even when a rogue or notorious app might not, and that's really something I've come to appreciate about the Pixel in the time I've used it. I've never had an incident where I'm mashing the home or back key just to get out of something that's locked up.

Bugs and stability

There is one annoying bug I've noticed: sometimes 'OK Google' always-on listening stops listening. It can be fixed by force closing the Google app or restarting the phone. It does seem to be happening less lately, but it's a real nuisance when it does. The entire point of always-on listening is to be there exactly when you need it, oftentimes hands-free. When it doesn't work, it discourages me from utilizing the feature because it starts to feel like I can't rely on it. Hopefully this gets addressed - who knows what's to blame, the Google app, Play Services, or the Pixel itself.

Other than this and the Wi-Fi issue, though, I've not really had any bugs or stability problems. The phone works well. Almost surprisingly well.

Overall

After two weeks, my opinion of the Pixel XL has not substantially lowered. In fact, if anything, it has grown: the consistent battery life and performance make it my favorite Android smartphone ever. Combine that with a stellar camera, four-carrier compatibility, Google's update promise, the latest version of Android, and highly capable if not industry-leading hardware, and the Pixel XL is exactly what I've always wanted in an Android phone: a truly excellent all-rounder.

It's easy to pick apart the Pixel for its pricing, comparisons to the iPhone's performance, and a lack of things like front-facing speakers and waterproofing. Would it be nice to have those things? Absolutely! I am not saying these arguments are invalid. But it would be nice to have a lot of things, and for what the Pixel provides, I am content to give up a few aspirational features for the sake of a smartphone experience that just works for me. Note that I say "for me" - the Pixel is not necessarily for everyone, as has been made clear over the past month-plus on Android Police and around the web. We definitely get it: a phone this pricey with specifications that don't absolutely destroy the competition is simply not what some people want.

But me? The Pixel has me sold. I'm finally ready to believe Google built a phone that has truly turned out to be great.

We'll be providing more thoughts on the Pixels in the weeks and months to come (a full camera review should be on the docket in the next couple weeks), so stay tuned.

DSC05438

Fossil Q Marshal and Q Wander review: The surest sign yet that Android Wear is on the ropes

Article Contents

  • 1 Specs
  • 2 The Good
  • 3 The Not So Good
  • 4 Design
    • 4.1 Q Marshal
    • 4.2 Q Wander
  • 5 Display
  • 6 Performance and battery
  • 7 Software
  • 8 Value and thoughts on Android Wear

Everyone was intrigued when Fossil announced it would make Android Wear devices. After all, it makes "real" watches, so maybe its smartwatches would be a cut above. The Q Founder was an okay smartwatch for its time. It was a little big, but it looked nice and had a fast Intel SoC. Now, Fossil is back with the Q Marshal and Q Wander. These smartwatches are some of the first to have the wearable-focused Snapdragon 2100 chip, but is that enough to make the a good purchase? Sadly, not really.

Specs

SoC Snapdragon 2100
RAM 512MB
Storage 4GB
Display 1.42-inch 320x290
Battery 360mAh
Protection IP67
Software Android Wear 1.5
Measurements 45mm x 14mm (13.5mm for Wander)

The Good

Design The Q Marshal has a "real" watch look and both watches fit well.
Bands Fossil's included bands are better than most.
Battery Slightly better battery life than past watches.

The Not So Good

Display These watches have awful LCDs with poor viewing angles, dull colors, and lots of ghosting. Flat tires too.
Design again The Q Wander is not very attractive in person. The crown buttons are also stiff and have too much travel on both.
Light sensor There isn't one.
Heart rate sensor Doesn't have one of these either.
Android Wear It's still Android Wear, which is in need of an update. When these watches will get v2.0 is anyone's guess.
Price At around $250, these watches are too expensive for what you get.

Design

While many of the specs are the same between the Q Wander and Q Marshal, the external designs are different. So, I'm going to break this section out into one for each watch. We'll link up again on the other side.

Q Marshal

Like the Q Founder, the Marshal adopts a very traditional watch design vibe. The body is a little more compact than the Founder, though. It's 45mm across, so it's still on the large side for a watch (smart or otherwise). The metal frame morphs smoothly into the prominent exposed lugs, which accommodate a standard 22mm watch band. The lugs curve down slightly toward the bottom side of the watch. This is a design feature I like to see as it keeps the band closer to my arm for a more comfortable fit.

fossil004

The face of the watch has the flat tire display, of course. Surrounding that is a ring with "teeth" that give it a cool visual flair. It's the same thing Samsung did with the shape of the Gear S3 and Motorola with the knurl pattern on the Moto 360 v2. On the left of the case is a single physical button right in the middle at the 3 o'clock position. I'm actually not in love with this button—it has a satisfying click when depressed, but there's a ton of travel and the action is stiff. On the opposite side is a speaker grille, which performs fine. It's a speaker in a watch, so don't go in expecting anything amazing.

fossil002

On the bottom is just a flat plastic cover. No heart rate measurements are happening here. That's kind of lame for the price, but the Q Founder didn't have one either. The version I have for review has a standard Fossil thick leather band. These are actually quite nice for a mainstream watch band. It's a little heavy for someone with thin wrists, but I can't complain too much. Metal link versions are available too.

fossil003

The Q Marshal could easily be mistaken for a real watch at a glance, which I think is what you want. It's a little larger than I'd prefer, but I have tiny little bird wrists.

Q Wander

The Wander has a much more unusual external design, but it's clearly related closely to the Q Marshal. It too has a 45mm case, but the shape is much more rounded than the Marshal. Frankly, this makes it look thicker, but it's actually a fraction of a millimeter thinner.

fossil006

I often find myself saying that a device looks nicer in person than it does in photos, but I think it's the other way around for the Q Wander. It's not the best looking smartwatch I've seen. If there's anything Fossil should be good at, it's designing an attractive case for all the smart stuff to go in. It's the lugs that take the watch from boring to a little goofy looking. They just sort of appear in the side of the case. There's no gentle transition or embellishment that helps them blend in. They're just round pegs that jut out.

fossil009

Despite being a less attractive watch overall, I think the Q Wander fits slightly better than the Marshal. The lugs don't extend as far outward, but they still tilt downward to keep the band close to your wrist. Like the Marshal, it uses a standard 22mm band. This review units has a thinner tan leather band with a softer finish. It gives the watch a somewhat feminine look, in my opinion. It seems like a good quality band, but it'll crease easily as it's so soft.

fossil008

Again, there's a speaker on the left side and a crown button on the right. The button is the same as the Q Marshal—so, not my favorite, but passable. It has the same plastic underside with no heart rate sensor.

Display

Things are probably sounding at least alright so far, right? What could go wrong? This: there's no ambient light sensor. These are far from the first Android Wear devices to lack this feature, but they're the first I can think of that have a flat tire  display and no light sensor in the cut off section. Some people are under the mistaken impression that the flat tire is entirely for the light sensor, but it's actually where the display drivers connect to a round LCD. It's just been traditional to put a light sensor there. The Founder had a light sensor, so I don't know why Fossil would remove it this time. The lack of a sensor means you have to control the brightness of your flat tire display manually. The display does get reasonably bright when you dig into the settings and change it, but the black levels are mediocre at best.

Let's be frank here—the flat tire is a compromise. Removing one of the only mitigating features makes me wonder why a device maker would go with a flat tire LCD at all. Surely round AMOLEDs are more accessible now. Maybe it's a cost issue, because seriously Fossil cheaped out on this display.

fossil1

The viewing angles of the LCD used in the Marshal and Wander are terrible. When you get about 45-degrees off-axis, the colors begin to distort noticeably, making text very difficult to read. Compare this to something like the Moto 360 v2, which has an LCD that's readable at all angles. The colors even when you're looking straight at the display aren't very impressive. It's a very dull screen.

My biggest problem with this display is the absolutely unacceptable amount of ghosting. The refresh rate feels incredibly slow. Everything leaves a blurry after image for a moment that looks awful. It doesn't help that most of Android Wear's UI is composed of cards that slide across the screen. The ghosting is extremely obvious when you swipe those white cards across a colored background.

Performance and battery

I was interested to get a look at these watches because they're some of the first to have the Snapdragon 2100 SoC. This chip was announced earlier in 2016 as Qualcomm's big push for next-gen wearables. Rather than re-purposing a SD400, the 2100 has a smaller footprint, draws less power, and is better for collecting sensor data.

I wish I could tell you this is what we've been waiting for, and the Snapdragon 2100 will finally do away with smartwatch battery anxiety, but it's just a small step up. That's not to say the Snapdragon 2100 is a bad chip; quite on the contrary, I think it's better than all the previous chips we've seen in smartwatches. It just isn't enough.

fossil011

With the Q Marshal and Wander, I'm seeing a little over 24 hours of battery life, which is solid in the context of existing smartwatches with always-on displays. It's a marginal improvement, but you will still have to charge the watch every night (assuming you want it to last all the way through the following day). I do really like the wireless charger Fossil has included with these watches. It's a small magnetic disk that attaches to the bottom of the device. The tiny Qi coil isn't picky about orientation or location, either. You can also use a standard Qi-based wireless charger to juice up the Q Wander and Q Marshal.

On the performance side, the Snapdragon 2100-powered watches don't feel dramatically different than older ones. These watches also have half the RAM of the Founder. That might be negatively impacting the SD2100, but I can't say for sure. It's hard to make a direct comparison. There's maybe a bit less lag in places, but Android Wear still isn't as responsive as I'd like.

Software

As you're probably aware, OEMs have very limited control over how Android Wear operates. They're restricted to some add-on __apps and watch faces. Fossil's approach to Android Wear is interesting in that respect. I assumed before I used the Q Founder that Fossil would create some of the best watch faces, but they were actually rather disappointing. It's the same story this time.

These watches have flat tire displays—that's just something you have to live with, but Fossil seems to be in denial about it. Many of the pre-loaded Fossil watch faces have the bottom of the design cut off in a way that only draws attention to the missing pixels. For an example of how to work with a flat tire, look at Motorola's watch faces. Fossil didn't even change the watch faces from last year that cut off a giant portion of the "6." Where's the attention to detail, guys?

1 2 3 4

Likewise, Fossil didn't address the near useless widgets on its watch faces. The default one when you turn the device on has a battery gauge so tiny you can't tell the difference between 75% and 50%, a weather icon (not the temperature), and what appears to be a step counter. I'm not sure because it never shows anything other than a "%" symbol. The watch faces you can download in the Play Store are vastly better than Fossil's pre-loads.

5 6 7

That brings us to the Fossil Q Android app... or rather it doesn't. Fossil has decided to drop support for the Android Wear devices in this app, so it's only for fitness bands and smart "real" watches. All the watch's functions are controlled on the watch itself and via the Wear app. The app wasn't very useful last year, but managing watch face profiles in the wearable Fossil Q app is tedious.

Value and thoughts on Android Wear

The Q Founder and Q Marshal come in a few different configurations, all of them priced around $250. They are not good purchases at that price. There are too many problems with the hardware to justify that amount of money. The displays are bad, there's no light sensor, the buttons are too stiff, and the Wander is a rather ugly watch. If these were priced as entry-level wearables, sure, I might be able to recommend them.

Even if they were good, I'm not sure anyone should be buying an expensive new Android Wear device right now. Google had to push back the release of Android Wear 2.0 because it was a convoluted mess. We've also seen a number of device makers step back from the wearable market. There's no new Huawei Watch or Moto 360 this year, and those were arguably the most successful Wear devices of the last generation. We don't even know what's going to happen with updates to Wear 2.0. I assume Fossil doesn't employ a bunch of Android developers, so Google is likely calling the shots with regard to the software. Will there be enough bandwidth to get updates to these watches in a timely manner? I don't know, but do you want to stake $250 on it?

fossil010

Smartwatch hardware has not advanced much since Wear was released more than two years ago. These are still devices that needs to be charged every day, and they're too expensive for what they do. Even the best Wear devices of last year were too expensive for any non-nerds to justify. Huawei sold versions of the Hwatch that cost as much as a Google Pixel, and they weren't any better than the cheap ones; they just looked different.

If you really want an Android Wear device right now, the Huawei Watch and Moto 360 can be found for less if you shop around a little. Despite the older ARM chip, they offer a superior experience. Fossil's new watches aren't good, and if this is what a $250 smartwatch with a proper wearable SoC is like in 2016, I think Wear is in deep trouble.